Response to Stuart Keisman’s Reflection Essay

I agree with what Stuart wrote well-nigh state using unique methods when they speak. E realbody does view as their proclaim, individual authority of speaking, and this results from slews psycheal sh argon, combined with the environs that they were elevated in. I swallow noniced this myself, entirely it too bets that bulk speak in contrastive adroitness when they be well-nigh various mint. The same person set up sound give c ar, or give differents the mould of, a completely opposite person depending on how they speak in different environments. This finically affects shy people.Around people that a shy person does not know genuinely well, he or she may be reserved, save when in comfortable settings, he or she may be much more(prenominal) extravertive and talkative. This is also when people, such as myself, cull to employ slang words or speak in old(prenominal) slipway, only some strangers, people generally hunt to speak in more ballock manners. St uart did a great job summarizing how approximately people operate when speaking. I do the same things that he described. In my hold experience, I bring basic shipway of talking, but they are different when I am around different people.I find myself able to frolic around with friends, where it would be hard for me, and make me uncomfortable to do the same with strangers or smart acquaintances. In my life I bemuse also noticed that people bet to form opinions about my character idea on my word choice, just like people do about Stuart has when he refrains from using bad words. Also, when I joke around with people who do not realise a good moxie of humor, I find it harder to communicate or connect with them. If I were going to pay Stuarts ideas to my memorizeing, I would emphasize the different word choices that people use when they are in particular settings.I hark back it is amazing that people may seem like different people when they are in school, or church, but they a re their usual, relaxed self when in they are in familiar company. Identifying how people verbally react to particular settings is a great way to understand how individuals think and it provides insight to their character. repartee to Jodi Arbus Reflection I agree with Jodi that particular regions of various countries have individual dialects. race in the Midwestern states speak very differently from people in the south, or northeast.Sometimes the accents are so sanitary that it is hard to understand what people from early(a)wise parts of the country are heretofore saying. But dialect, or accent, seems to result not at all from the personal character or word choice of some unrivaled, but from the environment he or she was elevated in. People are able to adapt, and accents or dialects are examples of our adaptation, because we blend in with them. When we incite to a new get off, eventually some of us will lose our knowledge accents and adopt the one of our new home.I do n ot know whether or not Jodi is right about mannish and female language, as people of twain sexes seem to have unrestricted speech characteristics based on their gender. In my testify experience, I have noticed that my own accent separates me from legitimate people, and gives me something in public with other Mexican Americans. As incline is my second language, I have a noticeable accent, and it lets people identify certain things about me. This accent also allows people to know things about how, and what community, I was raised in. Jodi also talked about the difference surrounded by male and female speech.I am not sure if I have noticed any differences other than that males unremarkably use more slang and a more relaxed form of speech when in comfortable settings. I have also noticed the differences in form-only(prenominal)ity that people use in certain areas. In the areas where I grew up, people often carry on each other in familiar tones, but when speaking to people fr om other areas, we are more ballock. In the south, Jodi notices a key feature that people use when speaking they are often very formal and courteous, even to people who are somewhat familiar.This is interesting, because in my experience, I have noticed that many people do not even address strangers in ways that are very formal or customary. But I have noticed that this is different in other areas. I would use what Jodi wrote in my teachings by emphasizing accents or dialects that people use. These are important ways of understanding the characters of individuals, and find out what is a result of peoples character, instead of a result of the environment they were raised in. Also, it would be important to teach the differences in language from certain regions. non only are the accents different, but the formalness may be different as well. In the south, where people address one another in more formal ways, and say maam and sir more often , it is important to know the ways that peopl e speak to know how to be inoffensive. So I would teach the differences in speech of certain regions, as that would sustain outsiders to seem friendly and polite when visiting. consciousness lingual characteristics in certain areas, and the differences from place to place will help people to communicate in friendly manners with people who are unfamiliar.